ChatGPT zei:
Below is the precise logical and mathematical reduction from (6) the full EIH N-body equation to (7) the two-body test-particle radial equation, stated in the same ontology you have been using (1PN, second-order space–time relation, no higher-order force ontology introduced).
1. Start point: full EIH equation (1PN, N bodies)
The Einstein–Infeld–Hoffmann equation gives, for body a,
r¨a=b=a∑rba3Gmbrba 1−c24c=a∑racGmc−c21c=b∑rbcGmc+c2va2+2vb2−4va⋅vb +c21b=a∑rba3Gmb[rba(4va−3vb)⋅(va−vb)].This is exact to first post-Newtonian order.
2. Two-body specialization
Let the system consist of:
-
central mass M (index b),
-
test particle m (index a),
-
with m≪M.
Then:
-
all sums collapse: only one interacting body,
-
self-interaction terms vanish automatically.
Thus:
b=a∑⇒b=M3. Test-particle limit m≪M
In the center-of-mass frame:
-
the heavy body is at rest to 1PN accuracy:
vM=0 -
the particle velocity is v=va.
Therefore:
vb2=0,va⋅vb=0.4. Simplify velocity-dependent terms
The velocity factor reduces to:
c2va2+2vb2−4va⋅vb⇒c2v2.The second velocity-dependent vector term becomes:
r(4v)⋅v=4(r⋅v)v.5. Reduce the potential sums
The remaining gravitational potential sum is simply:
c=a∑racGmc⇒rGM.Hence the Newtonian term acquires the standard 1PN correction:
r2GM(1−c2r4GM+c2v2).6. Convert vector equation to radial dynamics
Write the velocity decomposition:
v2=r˙2+r2L2,L=r2ϕ˙.Project the full equation onto the radial direction using:
r¨=r¨⋅r^.Key facts:
-
Terms proportional to r˙2 cancel at 1PN order
-
Tangential terms generate a correction to the centrifugal barrier
7. Resulting radial equation (1PN, test particle)
After simplification, all surviving terms combine into:
r¨=−r2GM+r3L2−c2r43GML28. Interpretation (important)
-
No new force is introduced
The last term is not a separate force; it is a second-order space–time relation correction within the same ontology. -
The correction originates from:
-
velocity–potential coupling,
-
curvature-induced modification of angular momentum transport.
-
-
This is exactly the standard 1PN test-particle reduction of the EIH equation.
9. Why no higher-order terms appear
Because:
-
EIH is truncated at O(c−2),
-
higher-order space-time relations (third order in your framework) are not part of the accepted EIH ontology.
Final statement
Equation (7) is not an approximation pulled from elsewhere; it is the unique radial reduction of equation (6) under:
-
two-body specialization,
-
test-particle limit,
-
center-of-mass frame,
-
first post-Newtonian truncation.
If you want, I can next:
-
redo the reduction without assuming circular orbits, or
-
map each term explicitly to your second vs third order space-by-time relations.